Iniciaste sesión como:
filler@godaddy.com
Scientific broadcasting is in many ways equivalent and similar to traditional academic publishing. Before we provide instructions on how to create your videoscript, it is important to properly define some terms that are used in Scientific Broadcasts (SB).
SB Channels are parts of Scientific Broadcasts that release scicasts related to a specific scientific discipline. Inside SB there can be only one Channel per discipline, but the boundaries of each Channel may vary. There can be, for example, a Channel about Paleontology, or it could be divided into different Channel for each sub-discipline of Paleontology (e.g., Paleobotany, Vertebrate, and Invertebrate Paleontology). In any case and once its boundaries have been defined, each Channel is scientifically independent and run by its own Scientific Board. Each Channel is run by scientific or academic entities (e.g., universities, associations, organizations, etc.) that are responsible for the scientific content that gets released.
Channels are something like the traditional Academic Journals.
The SB Scinematographer is, usually, the person responsible for the total scientific and audiovisual content of a scicast. The Scinematographer leads — on behalf of the entire scientific team, if present — the Production of the Rough Cut of the scicast, and collaborates with the Channel for the final edits during the Post-Production. In some cases, a project might not have a Scinematographer, and the Producer will help the auctors to select a Scinematographer for their project. Thus, a Director might only have an artistic role in the Production of a scicast and could be totally disassociated with the scientific content; this should be made explicit.
The Scinematographers are something the leading Authors of a traditional Academic Paper.
SB Auctors (= authors + actors) are, at the same time, the writers of the screenplay, the creators of the visual scientific of the scicast, and the performers that lend their voices and faces. They form part of the scientific team of each scicast, and are placed in the Billing according to their contributions; the top billing auctor is the scientist that contributed the most in the scientific part of the scicasts. In some cases the top billing Auctor could be also the Director.
Auctors are something like the authors of a traditional Academic Paper.
SB Producers are those members of the working teams of each Channel, that are responsible for producing the scicasts. Alternatively, Producers can external to the Channel, and brought to a given project by the Scinematographer, who has the right to select a Producer of their choice. The first task of Producers is to evaluate the submitted videoscripts in order to make a decision (greenlight: the submission enters the pipeline for production | redlight: the submission is rejected).
Once the project is green-lit, Producers assist the Scinematographers in the production of the scicast. They usually deal with one scicast per time, and form the link between the Scinematographer and the Channel. They are there to help and offer constructive feedback, as well as to try to solve any problems that might occur. They arrange and supervise the evaluation of the Rough Cut versions and approve the conclusion of the main Production Stage.
Producers are something like the Editors of the traditional Academic Journals.
Each SB Channel should have a team of people that are responsible for the Post-Production of the scicast, who can also assist in previous stages if necessary. These should minimally include: (1) a Screenwriter, a person responsible of revising the script of the scicast; (2) a Video Editor, a person responsible for all edits and improvements related to the visual part of the scicast; and (3) a Sound Editor, a person responsible for all edits and improvements related to the audio part of the scicast.
Screenwriters are something like Copyeditors, while Video and Sound Editors are something like the Galley Editors and Designers of the traditional Academic Papers.
All scicasts are being constantly evaluated during the different stages of their production. The opinion of the public and especially of other scientists and experts is important. So when we need their opinion, we ask them to join internal and external screenings as Critics. Critics can be other scientists, science communicators or policy makers, and even moviemakers. Each Channel has a number of affiliated critics that work closely together, but each screening is different. In those cases, different critics that meet our target group criteria will be openly invited to provide feedback.
Critics are always asked to contribute constructively and will always have to respond to a customized list of questions that address specific questions related to your project. In some cases, critics might join special roundtable discussions or even face-to-face meetings to address issues that might require a different kind of feedback.
Critics are something like the Reviewers of the traditional Academic Publishing.
Scientific Broadcast Studio (SBS) is the online platform that will allow the production of scicast. SBS is divided into the different stages of production, namely Greenlight, Wrap, Final Cut, and Release, allowing scinematographers to produce their scicasts. Each stage contains the necessary instructions in a step-by-step process. Along the way, SBS will incorporate tools, functions and services to become an independent all-in-one platform for the production of scicasts.
Studio are something like the Submission Systems of the traditional Academic Journals.
If you have reached this section, it means that you are ready to take the first step towards thinking outside the page. Congratulations! We know that feels like a huge change compared to what you have been used so far, but remember that we are here to help you and make this process as simple and enjoyable as possible. Here, we provide the basic information to get you started.
Also, remember that we are doing our Baby Steps right now. So, some of the functions or processes that we are planning for the final Scientific Broadcasts Platform are not ready yet. This means that there might be some limitations or difficulties, but this is something that we accept and understand; we will try to make this as easy as possible for you, even if it means some extra work from our side.
As this is the start of something new and beautiful, you might have some doubts. Are you capable of producing a scicast? Well, let's find out! Please ask yourself the following questions:
If the answer to the questions above is yes, then you can definitely produce a scicast!
Here comes the first decision that you will have to make:
What kind of scicast are you planning to produce?
If you would like to produce a scicast that is based on your own original research that is novel and has never been published before, click on the button on the right to submit your videoscript.
A videoscript is a draft file that allow us to evaluate both the scientific content as well as the audiovisual impact of your work. There are no strict guidelines in this initial first step: your videoscript could be a basic transcript with some images or concept art, a grant proposal, or a document.
However, our preferred format is a simple recording of a narrated slideshow presentation. It could be a simple on-screen recording, a video export of a rehearsed slideshow presentation, or even a recording of you presenting the topic on a virtual or in-person event. The most important is that we should be able to get the basic scientific information and judge the potential audiovisual impact.
If you would like to produce a scicast that is based on your own original research that has been published before, click on the button on the right to submit your proposal. We cannot guarantee that your proposal will be accepted due to potential copyright or permission issues, but we will handle all communication with the publisher to achieve that.
Please explain why you think that your previously published paper should be considered for the production of a scicast, especially explaining its audiovisual impact and interest that has been left out from the original paper. Also, please provide a pdf of the paper or a link to download it (if it is Open Access), clarifying if the information will appear as originally published or if revisions/corrections are needed. Note that any sort of academic impact factors, metrics or citations do not play a role in our decision.
Just like above, we also ask you to submit a videoscript with your proposal. A videoscript is a draft file that allow us to evaluate both the scientific content as well as the audiovisual impact of your work. There are no strict guidelines in this initial first step: your videoscript could be a basic transcript with some images or concept art, a grant proposal, or a document.
However, our preferred format is a simple recording of a narrated slideshow presentation. It could be a simple on-screen recording, a video export of a rehearsed slideshow presentation, or even a recording of you presenting the topic on a virtual or in-person event. The most important is that we should be able to get the basic scientific information and judge the potential audiovisual impact.
*The authors of the chosen paper should not be alive at the time of submission, and ideally should be a non-contemporaneous paper.
Is there a classic paper in your field with such an impact and audiovisual content that would benefit from the production of a scicast? A paper with high scientific and educational value, the very best landmark science of previous decades or centuries that remains trapped in the page?
Imagine a scicast on papers by Newton, Einsten, Curie, or Darwin. If you think that you have what it takes, please click on the button to the right to submit your idea. We cannot guarantee that your proposal will be accepted due to potential copyright or permission issues, but we will handle all communication with the publisher to achieve that.
The format of these scicasts is different: (1) on one hand, a scicast must be produced presenting the original information as it appeared on the original paper, enhanced with original or new audiovisual information (e.g., live reproduction of the original experiments). The narration of these papers will be done by actors. (2) on the other hand, you should produce short comments by at least one (1) expert on the topic (that could be you, of course), commenting on several parts of the original paper that might have proved or refuted up to now, or with other kind of important information and/or trivia. Please provide a pdf of the paper or a link to download it (if it is Open Access), and a preliminary list of experts that have agreed to appear in your scicast.
Just like above, we also ask you to submit a videoscript with your proposal. A videoscript is a draft file that allow us to evaluate both the scientific content as well as the audiovisual impact of your work. There are no strict guidelines in this initial first step: your videoscript could be a basic transcript with some images or concept art, a grant proposal, or a document.
However, our preferred format is a simple recording of a narrated slideshow presentation. It could be a simple on-screen recording, a video export of a rehearsed slideshow presentation, or even a recording of you presenting the topic on a virtual or in-person event. The most important is that we should be able to get the basic scientific information and judge the potential audiovisual impact.
In this first stage of our project, we ask you to prepare your videoscript at your home computer with external software of your choice. We provide templates, ideas and instructions for the most widely used tools and programs available right now.
Once our platform is ready, you will be able to fully produce your scicast online.
For the time being, here are the three available options:
Use the software of your choice and prepare a slideshow presentation with narrations (either as recordings or inserted audio files).
Don't worry about format and style yet; we will handle this in post-production.
If given the greenlight, you will have to submit together with your Rough Cut all the original files (images, videos, audios) as well, to allow our edits and improvements.
Use the software of your choice and prepare a home-made video.
Don't worry about format and style yet; we will handle this in post-production.
If given the greenlight, you will have to submit together with your Rough Cut all the original files (images, videos, audios) as well, to allow our edits and improvements.
Although we prefer that you will actually create your own scicast, we can also accept videos made by others, like a professional team of moviemakers of your choice.
If this is your choice, please bring us in contact with your moviemakers to discuss details.
Scientific Broadcasts — think outside the page
Copyright © 2023 Scientific Broadcasts - Todos los derechos reservados.
Con tecnología de GoDaddy
Usamos cookies para analizar el tráfico del sitio web y optimizar tu experiencia en el sitio. Al aceptar nuestro uso de cookies, tus datos se agruparán con los datos de todos los demás usuarios.